A comparative evaluation of mechanical retention

Guru r, kore a comparative evaluation of bond strength of surface-treated and surface-modified anterior acrylic teeth to heat cure denture base: an in vitro study int j oral care res mechanical retention in this experiment, the mechanical interlock joined polymethyl methacrylate (pmma) denture. ‘virginia bridges’ are another type which make use of ‘macroscopic mechanical retention’ mechanisms that create large undercut areas for retention 3 ‘etched cast resin bonded dentures’ (maryland bridges) employs ‘micromechanical retention’ and for this, electrolytic etching of alloy surface is done ‘adhesion bridges’ make use of adhesives with provision for chemical bonding to metal.

a comparative evaluation of mechanical retention A significant difference in bond strength of the metal crowns was observed upon comparative evaluation of groups e1, e2, and e3 compared to the control group, there was a significant increase in bond strength for all three subgroups.

Comparative evaluation of three heat and moisture exchangers during short-term postoperative mechanical ventilation. Comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and conventional cast post: in vitro evaluation of retention of refaricated and conventional cast ost to the mechanical retention.

A comparative evaluation of the retention of denture bases journal of contemporary dentistry, september-december 20144(3):139-144 141 jcd was instructed to make functional movements like swallowing, speech and pursing of lips after three minutes the tray was removed and impression was. A comparative evaluation of the retention of denture bases journal of contemporary dentistry, september-december 20144(3):139-144 jcd retention. A comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth ----- vaidya vidya n & chitnis deepa p fig ii: canal width and post diameter of group b and c after irr as compared to group a which was to receive cast post and core.

Comparative evaluation of different mechanical modifications done on cross-linked teeth for bond strength between high-impact acrylic material and cross-linked teeth materials and methods a total number of 80 cross-linked maxillary left central incisors (21) (acryloc), of the same mold with regard to size and shape were selected to be bonded to lucitone199 resin material.

A comparative evaluation of mechanical retention

a comparative evaluation of mechanical retention A significant difference in bond strength of the metal crowns was observed upon comparative evaluation of groups e1, e2, and e3 compared to the control group, there was a significant increase in bond strength for all three subgroups.

In the present study, at the final evaluation (12 months) both the aegis and delton groups showed 76% and 74% complete retention which is similar to the study conducted by shashikiran et al who observed high retention rates of 76-85% after 10 months. A comparative evaluation of the retention of tooth coloured and stainless steel endodontic posts: an in-vitro study kiran keswani , 1 rahul maria , 2 and rohit punga 3 1 reader, department of conservative dentistry and endodontics, vyas dental college and hospital, jodhpur, rajasthan, india.

1 journal of international society of preventive and community dentistry vol o comparative evaluation of retention of prefabricated and conventional cast post: an in vitro study suchismita. A comparative evaluation of the effect of resin based sealers on retention of crown cemented with three types of cement - an in vitro study a comparative evaluation of the effect of resin based sealers on retention of crown cemented with three types of cement – an in vitro study the mechanical properties of the cement can influence. Comparative evaluation of retention ability of amorphous calcium phosphate containing and illuminating pit & fi ssure sealants in 6-9 year old age group.

a comparative evaluation of mechanical retention A significant difference in bond strength of the metal crowns was observed upon comparative evaluation of groups e1, e2, and e3 compared to the control group, there was a significant increase in bond strength for all three subgroups.
A comparative evaluation of mechanical retention
Rated 3/5 based on 33 review
Download